Independent Journalism · Not Legal Advice · Verify Against the Court Record · Editorial Policy

Abu Dhabi Peace Talks in November: Dates, Agenda and the Territory Question

Ukrainian and Russian officials say negotiators from their countries and the United States plan to meet in Abu Dhabi in November for their first three-way session since February. In its October 27, 2026 report on proposed postwar business deals, the Financial Times said Washington hopes to make progress at those Abu Dhabi peace talks toward a possible settlement.

Where it stands: The round still had no announced start date as of Oct. 28. On Oct. 23, both Volodymyr Zelensky and Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the round was planned for the first half of November.

The business ideas the FT described are not settled. An unnamed US official said in the FT that any economic agreements would be “subject to a comprehensive peace framework that stops the killing in this brutal war; nothing is finalised.” The FT also noted that Putin “has not shown any indication he will moderate his hardline negotiating position.”

When are the Abu Dhabi peace talks?

No date had been announced as of Oct. 28. Kyiv and Moscow have both pointed to November, with Zelensky and Peskov naming the first half of the month, but other Russian statements have been reported with different windows.

Zelensky, speaking to the Hudson Institute by video, said: “The plan is to meet in the first half of November and as early as possible, of course, but we are ready to meet any day, even tomorrow.” Peskov told reporters the round was “planned for the first half of November in Abu Dhabi” and would “take place in a trilateral format.”

Who Timing given Reported by
Volodymyr Zelensky, Oct. 23 First half of November Kyiv Independent
Dmitry Peskov, Oct. 23 First half of November, in Abu Dhabi RTÉ News
Yuri Ushakov, Oct. 21 Possibly mid-November Reuters via Al Jazeera
Vladimir Putin, Oct. 21 After November 10 CNN
Ushakov, per Kremlin transcript Early November CBS News
Unnamed sources Next month, Abu Dhabi Financial Times, Oct. 27

The venue has firmed up over the past week. On Oct. 21, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said only that the round “could take place in Abu Dhabi,” CNN reported. Two days later Peskov named the Emirati capital outright.

Why is this the first round since February?

Because the last attempt to restart trilateral talks fell through. The three sides met three times early this year, then stopped.

The first meeting, in Abu Dhabi on Jan. 23-24, was, The National reported, “the first trilateral meeting since the start of the war.” A second Abu Dhabi round followed on Feb. 4-5 and produced a prisoner exchange, Anadolu Agency reported. The third was held in Geneva on Feb. 17-18, where Russian negotiator Vladimir Medinsky called the talks “difficult, but businesslike.” Zelensky said afterward there was progress on military questions such as ceasefire monitoring, but the political positions still differed.

Al Jazeera noted the February talks came “just days before the US and Israel launched their war against Iran.” The track then stalled. Zelensky said Ukraine had expected another trilateral meeting in October, “but it didn’t happen because the Russians came up with another reason not to meet.” On Oct. 8, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said: “There are currently no plans to hold talks in this format.” Our October talks roundup covers that stretch. Momentum returned after Steve Witkoff’s Oct. 21 meeting with Putin in St Petersburg, when Ushakov said Moscow was ready “in principle” to resume; we cover that meeting in our report on Witkoff’s notes.

What is on the agenda?

Security guarantees, according to the FT, which said the talks “will focus on possible security guarantees for Russia and Ukraine after the war ends.” Each side means something different by that.

Ushakov said the Kremlin wants to discuss a “security framework” for both countries once the conflict ends, CNN reported, without spelling out what Russia would demand. Zelensky set out Kyiv’s terms on Oct. 23: firm guarantees and “at least 10 years of international funding” for Ukraine’s armed forces before any lasting agreement, according to the Kyiv Post. “We need a big, big strong army, minimum ten years,” he said.

Zelensky also wants the process to climb a level. “We need to move from trilateral negotiations at the technical level to a meeting of leaders, because the key issues can only be resolved at that level,” he said.

📨 Get Free Accountability Coverage Alerts

Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime

Has the US changed its position on Ukrainian territory?

The FT reports that it has, at least in tone. Washington previously linked future guarantees for Ukraine to territorial concessions, but “has since indicated it will not push Kyiv to surrender land at the negotiating table,” the paper said, citing two people briefed on the talks.

That account rests on the FT’s sources alone; we found no independent confirmation from other outlets as of October 28. The gap it would have to bridge is wide. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Oct. 8 that a negotiated end was out of reach because Russia insists on taking all of Donetsk Oblast without fighting, “a demand Kyiv has rejected,” the Kyiv Independent reported. The late-2025 US draft plan contained territorial clauses of its own; we lay them out in our guide to the 28-point plan.

How do business deals and sanctions fit into the talks?

They run on a parallel track that Kyiv wants kept in check. The FT reported that US and Russian officials have discussed postwar ventures, from oil to aviation, as incentives for Moscow, mostly without Ukraine in the room. Our full list of the reported proposals has the details.

Zelensky has warned against giving up leverage before the leaders meet. “I would not want us to approach the meeting of the three leaders – Ukraine, the United States, and Russia – having already lifted all sanctions against the Russian Federation,” he told the Kyiv Post. “Sanctions were imposed in response to aggression, not as a price for the mere opportunity to talk.” Earlier in October he answered Rubio: “You can’t, on the one hand, negotiate with Russia about future economic projects, and on the other, talk about a diplomatic impasse.”

The White House has made the opposite argument about sanctions. Defending Executive Order 14436, signed October 16, 2026, which waived new Graham Act sanctions, spokesperson Taylor Rogers said: “Enforcing the sanctions provisions now would impede ongoing U.S. efforts to negotiate a durable and comprehensive peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia.” Before Abu Dhabi, Zelensky said Ukraine, the US, the EU and NATO planned a broad meeting in Brussels during the week of Oct. 26 on security, guarantees and European integration.

Frequently Asked Questions

When are the Abu Dhabi peace talks?

There was no fixed date as of Oct. 28. Zelensky and Peskov both said on Oct. 23 that the round is planned for the first half of November. Other reports cited mid-November, early November and after November 10.

Who will take part in the Abu Dhabi talks?

The talks are trilateral, with negotiating teams from Ukraine, Russia and the United States, according to Zelensky and Peskov.

When did Ukraine and Russia last hold talks?

The last trilateral round was in Geneva on Feb. 17-18, 2026. It followed two rounds in Abu Dhabi on Jan. 23-24 and Feb. 4-5, the second of which produced a prisoner swap.

Is the US pressuring Ukraine to give up land?

The FT reported, citing two people briefed on the talks, that Washington has signalled it will no longer press Ukraine to cede territory in the talks. Other outlets had not confirmed this as of October 28.

What will the Abu Dhabi talks focus on?

Postwar security guarantees for both countries are the main subject, according to the FT. Zelensky is seeking firm guarantees and long-term funding for Ukraine’s army; the Kremlin wants a security framework covering both countries.

Sources


This article is news reporting and analysis based on the public sources listed above, as they stood on the dates shown. Where officials, lawmakers or analysts disagree, including on whether an action is lawful, their positions are attributed to them; Donald Trump Class Action is not a court and nothing here is legal advice. Facts in a developing story can change.

Owed money from a settlement? Check what is open at OpenClassActions.com. Caring for someone with dementia? Find practical guides at HelpDementia.com. Working out a skin routine? Evidence-based answers at AcneAdvocate.com. Forgot the name of a movie? Identify it at FindThisMovie.com. Was your data exposed? Track active breaches at DataBreachRadar.com.
⚠️ OPINION & EDITORIAL CONTENT: All articles, commentary, and analysis on donaldtrumpclassaction.com represent the personal opinions of the authors and are presented for informational and editorial purposes only. This site is not affiliated with Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, or any government agency. Nothing here constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. Read full disclaimer.

We use essential cookies to make this site work and remember your preferences. We do not use advertising or analytics cookies. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy.